lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] ibmvfc: store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ during cleanup
From
Date
On 2/16/21 6:58 AM, Brian King wrote:
> On 2/11/21 12:57 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
>> index ba6fcf9cbc57..23b803ac4a13 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
>> @@ -5670,7 +5670,7 @@ static int ibmvfc_register_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost,
>>
>> irq_failed:
>> do {
>> - plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, scrq->cookie);
>> + rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, scrq->cookie);
>> } while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc));
>
> Other places in the driver where we get a busy return code back we have an msleep(100).
> Should we be doing that here as well?

Indeed, and actually even better would be to use rtas_busy_delay() which will
perform the sleep with the correct ms delay, and marks itself with the
might_sleep() macro.

-Tyrel

>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-17 11:38    [W:0.032 / U:1.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site