Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:30:44 +0100 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 34/33] netfs: Use in_interrupt() not in_softirq() |
| |
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:29:31AM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Is there a better way to do it? The intent is to process the assessment phase > in the calling thread's context if possible rather than bumping over to a > worker thread. For synchronous I/O, for example, that's done in the caller's > thread. Maybe that's the answer - if it's known to be asynchronous, I have to > punt, but otherwise don't have to.
Yes, i think you want an explicit flag instead.
| |