lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 net-next 03/10] net: bridge: don't print in br_switchdev_set_port_flag
From
Date


On 2/12/2021 7:15 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
>
> For the netlink interface, propagate errors through extack rather than
> simply printing them to the console. For the sysfs interface, we still
> print to the console, but at least that's one layer higher than in
> switchdev, which also allows us to silently ignore the offloading of
> flags if that is ever needed in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>

I suppose the slight "loss" of information on which port failed the
operation is okay since it was implied by either the path (sysfs) or the
bridge command.
--
Florian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-12 19:10    [W:0.140 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site