lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3][RESEND] add support for never printing hashed addresses
From
Date


On 2/10/21 10:46 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Now the question is, why do you need the unhashed pointer?
>
> Currently, the instruction pointer is what is fine right? You get the
> a function and its offset. If there's something that is needed, perhaps we
> should look at how to fix that, instead of just unhashing all pointers by
> default.

The original version of this patch only fixed print_hex_dump(), because
hashed addresses didn't make any sense for that. Each address is
incremented by 16 or 32, but since they were all hashed, they may as
well have been random numbers.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-10 18:23    [W:0.052 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site