Messages in this thread | | | From | Dmitry Vyukov <> | Date | Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:27:38 +0100 | Subject | Re: syzbot reporting less duplicates |
| |
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:24 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote: > > Hi! > On Wed 2021-02-03 19:22:34, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:39 PM bobwxc <bobwxc@email.cn> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 05:05:43PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > On Mon 2021-02-01 11:52:12, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > > > Could we please get common prefix (like syzbot: KASAN:....) so that > > > > the bulk of emails is easier to remove? > > > There are several bots testing on the kernel, maybe we should give a prefix > > > format for all bot. > > > Also we can use mail-address to fliter email, but it's still a little > > > inconvenient. > > > > Hi Pavel, bobwxc, > > > > Yes, I was wondering if syzbot in From/To/CC can be used for > > filtering? I assume email clients that can filter based on subject can > > also filter based on From/To/CC. > > Does anybody filter syzbot emails? Maybe you can share what works > > best? > > From does not really work. So... syzbot reports for subsystems I don't > maintain are uninteresting, and so is the resulting discussion. > > While filtering on "From:" is easy for initial report, it does not > make it easy to remove follow up discussion.n
I've filed https://github.com/google/syzkaller/issues/2435 to track the subject feature request. I thought that maybe filtering based on From/To/CC should work right away, it should capture follow up discussions as well.
> > I am not sure a common prefix for all bots is useful because it > > supports only all or nothing. There are also some bots that > > maintainers use now that seem to be fundamental to the process, if one > > is ignoring them, then they are effectively ignoring what the > > maintainer is saying. > > I'm pretty sure common prefix for all bots is useful. > > Best regards, > Pavel > -- > http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
| |