lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm64: mm: Use asid2idx() and asid feature macro for cleanup
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 10:21:26AM +0800, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
> On 2021/12/7 0:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 08:27:23PM +0800, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
> >> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static u64 new_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >> u64 generation = atomic64_read(&asid_generation);
> >>
> >> if (asid != 0) {
> >> - u64 newasid = generation | (asid & ~ASID_MASK);
> >> + u64 newasid = generation | asid2idx(asid);
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * If our current ASID was active during a rollover, we
> >> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ unsigned long arm64_mm_context_get(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >> out_unlock:
> >> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_asid_lock, flags);
> >>
> >> - asid &= ~ASID_MASK;
> >> + asid = asid2idx(asid);
> >
> > While functionally the code is the same, I don't think this was the
> > intention of asid2idx(). It's meant to provide an index into asid_map,
> > while the ASID_MASK lines isolate the asid number and add a new
> > generation to it.
>
> The commit 0c8ea531b774 ("arm64: mm: Allocate ASIDs in pairs") introduce the
> asid2idx and idx2asid macro, but these macros is not really useful after the
> commit f88f42f853a8 ("arm64: context: Free up kernel ASIDs if KPTI is not in use").
>
> I think "(asid & ~ASID_MASK)" can be instead by a macro, it is the same code with
> asid2idx(). Can it be renamed? (eg, ctxid2asid)

Yes, that would work.

--
Catalin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-07 11:50    [W:0.043 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site