Messages in this thread | | | From | Ulf Hansson <> | Date | Mon, 6 Dec 2021 12:26:52 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] PM: runtime: Fix pm_runtime_active() kerneldoc comment |
| |
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 17:19, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > The kerneldoc comment of pm_runtime_active() does not reflect the > behavior of the function, so update it accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Kind regards Uffe
> --- > include/linux/pm_runtime.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Index: linux-pm/include/linux/pm_runtime.h > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/pm_runtime.h > +++ linux-pm/include/linux/pm_runtime.h > @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static inline bool pm_runtime_suspended( > * pm_runtime_active - Check whether or not a device is runtime-active. > * @dev: Target device. > * > - * Return %true if runtime PM is enabled for @dev and its runtime PM status is > + * Return %true if runtime PM is disabled for @dev or its runtime PM status is > * %RPM_ACTIVE, or %false otherwise. > * > * Note that the return value of this function can only be trusted if it is > > >
| |