lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PM: runtime: Fix pm_runtime_active() kerneldoc comment
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 17:19, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> The kerneldoc comment of pm_runtime_active() does not reflect the
> behavior of the function, so update it accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Kind regards
Uffe

> ---
> include/linux/pm_runtime.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static inline bool pm_runtime_suspended(
> * pm_runtime_active - Check whether or not a device is runtime-active.
> * @dev: Target device.
> *
> - * Return %true if runtime PM is enabled for @dev and its runtime PM status is
> + * Return %true if runtime PM is disabled for @dev or its runtime PM status is
> * %RPM_ACTIVE, or %false otherwise.
> *
> * Note that the return value of this function can only be trusted if it is
>
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-06 12:28    [W:0.037 / U:0.936 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site