Messages in this thread | | | From | Kashyap Desai <> | Date | Mon, 6 Dec 2021 15:33:07 +0530 | Subject | RE: [PATCH RFT 0/3] blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() for shared tags |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: John Garry [mailto:john.garry@huawei.com] > Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 3:28 PM > To: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>; axboe@kernel.dk > Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > ming.lei@redhat.com; hare@suse.de > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 0/3] blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() > for shared tags > > On 26/11/2021 11:51, John Garry wrote: > >> This patch set improves above call trace even after disk_util=0 is set. > > ok, fine. Thanks for testing. > > > > So I guess that this is a regression, and you would want this series > > for v5.16, right? My changes were made with v5.17 in mind. > > > > I am not sure how Jens feels about it, since the changes are > > significant. It would be a lot easier to argue for v5.16 if we got to > > this point earlier in the cycle... > > > > note: I will now resend for 5.17 and add your tested-by, please let me > know if > unhappy about that.
John - 5.17 should be OK. I am doing additional testing and so far no issue.
Tested-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
> > > Anyway, it would be good to have full review first, so please help > > with that. > > > > @Ming, can you please give feedback on 3/3 here? > > Thanks and also to Hannes for the reviews. > > john [unhandled content-type:application/pkcs7-signature] | |