Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 30 Dec 2021 07:40:55 +0900 | From | William Breathitt Gray <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 05/23] counter: 104-quad-8: Convert to counter_priv() wrapper |
| |
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 12:15:22PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello William, > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 04:27:33PM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 10:45:08AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > This is a straight forward conversion to the new counter_priv() wrapper. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> > > > > This patch results in a minor merge conflict with commit c95cc0d95702 > > ("counter: 104-quad-8: Fix persistent enabled events bug") in linux-next > > due to context changes in quad8_events_configure() and > > quad8_watch_validate(). Fixing this after a rebase is trivial so I'll > > give my Ack here. > > this raises the question how this patch set is to be merged. My > expectaion up to now was, that this goes via you, so the merge conflict > shouldn't be an issue? What is your expectation who will pick up this > series? > > Would a PR helpful, or will the series be picked up from the mailing > list? > > I'm about to prepare a v3 adding all the review tags and fixing the few > issues that were pointed out. > > Best regards > Uwe > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | > Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
If Greg or Jonathan don't pick this series up from the mailing list here, I can merge it to my personal tree and then submit it in the next cycle with any other Counter subsystem changes that come in along the way.
William Breathitt Gray [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |