lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add dt-bindings for Sunplus SP7021
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 12:44:25PM +0000, Wells Lu 呂芳騰 wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Thanks a lot for review.
>
> I ran 'make dt_binding_check' and got PASS before I submitted the dt-binding doc (yaml) file.
>
> I found the "dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:" is resulted from lack of vendor name in "vendor-prefixes.yaml".
>
> My colleague has submitted a patch for adding our company name to the yaml file. It was acknowledged by you but not yet committed into Linux tree.
>
> Refer to:
>
> On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:01:51 +0800, Qin Jian wrote:
> > Add vendor prefix for Sunplus Technology Co., Ltd.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qin Jian <qinjian@cqplus1.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>
>
> Can this error be waived?

No. The patch for vendor prefix has to be applied before this one or
we'll keep getting this error.

> When I send a new patch, should I add "vendor-prefixes.yaml"?

As it doesn't look like that series is going to make 5.17?, I can apply
the vendor prefix patch.

Rob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-27 17:03    [W:0.389 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site