Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 Dec 2021 12:02:19 -0400 | From | Rob Herring <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add dt-bindings for Sunplus SP7021 |
| |
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 12:44:25PM +0000, Wells Lu 呂芳騰 wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Thanks a lot for review. > > I ran 'make dt_binding_check' and got PASS before I submitted the dt-binding doc (yaml) file. > > I found the "dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:" is resulted from lack of vendor name in "vendor-prefixes.yaml". > > My colleague has submitted a patch for adding our company name to the yaml file. It was acknowledged by you but not yet committed into Linux tree. > > Refer to: > > On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:01:51 +0800, Qin Jian wrote: > > Add vendor prefix for Sunplus Technology Co., Ltd. > > > > Signed-off-by: Qin Jian <qinjian@cqplus1.com> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > > > Can this error be waived?
No. The patch for vendor prefix has to be applied before this one or we'll keep getting this error.
> When I send a new patch, should I add "vendor-prefixes.yaml"?
As it doesn't look like that series is going to make 5.17?, I can apply the vendor prefix patch.
Rob
| |