Messages in this thread | | | From | Pkshih <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v2] rtw88: check for validity before using a pointer | Date | Fri, 24 Dec 2021 07:51:36 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> > Sent: Friday, December 24, 2021 3:36 PM > To: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <tony0620emma@gmail.com>; Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>; David S. Miller > <davem@davemloft.net>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; Bernie Huang <phhuang@realtek.com>; Pkshih > <pkshih@realtek.com>; open list:REALTEK WIRELESS DRIVER (rtw88) <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; open > list:NETWORKING DRIVERS <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Cc: usama.anjum@collabora.com; kernel@collabora.com > Subject: [PATCH v2] rtw88: check for validity before using a pointer > > ieee80211_probereq_get() can return NULL. Pointer skb should be checked > for validty before use. If it is not valid, list of skbs needs to be > freed to not memory leak. > > Fixes: 10d162b2ed39 ("rtw88: 8822c: add ieee80211_ops::hw_scan") > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> > > --- > v2: > Free the list in case of error > --- > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c | 10 +++++++++- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c > index 2f7c036f9022..7e1fab7afb69 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c > @@ -1857,7 +1857,7 @@ static int rtw_hw_scan_update_probe_req(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, > { > struct cfg80211_scan_request *req = rtwvif->scan_req; > struct sk_buff_head list; > - struct sk_buff *skb; > + struct sk_buff *skb, *tmp; > u8 num = req->n_ssids, i; > > skb_queue_head_init(&list); > @@ -1866,11 +1866,19 @@ static int rtw_hw_scan_update_probe_req(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, > req->ssids[i].ssid, > req->ssids[i].ssid_len, > req->ie_len); > + if (!skb) > + goto out; > rtw_append_probe_req_ie(rtwdev, skb, &list, rtwvif); > kfree_skb(skb); > } > > return _rtw_hw_scan_update_probe_req(rtwdev, num, &list); > + > +out: > + skb_queue_walk_safe(&list, skb, tmp)
Don't you think skb_queue_walk() is enough? Because we don't need to do skb_unlink() in the loop.
> + kfree_skb(skb); > + > + return -ENOMEM; > } > > static int rtw_add_chan_info(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw_chan_info *info, > --
Ping-Ke
| |