Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:50:28 +0300 | Subject | Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the arm-soc tree | From | Arınç ÜNAL <> |
| |
Hey Florian.
I'm not sure I understand what's going wrong here. I did everything according to the documentation here: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/realtek-smi.txt#L158
On 23/12/2021 02:58, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 12/22/21 3:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:59 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> After merging the arm-soc tree, today's linux-next build (arm >>> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning: >>> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47094-asus-rt-ac88u.dts:109.4-14: Warning (reg_format): /switch/ports:reg: property has invalid length (4 bytes) (#address-cells == 2, #size-cells == 1) >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47094-asus-rt-ac88u.dtb: Warning (pci_device_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format' >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47094-asus-rt-ac88u.dtb: Warning (pci_device_bus_num): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format' >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47094-asus-rt-ac88u.dtb: Warning (i2c_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format' >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47094-asus-rt-ac88u.dtb: Warning (spi_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format' >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47094-asus-rt-ac88u.dts:106.9-149.5: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /switch/ports: Relying on default #address-cells value >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47094-asus-rt-ac88u.dts:106.9-149.5: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /switch/ports: Relying on default #size-cells value >>> >>> Maybe introduced by commit >>> >>> 3d2d52a0d183 ("ARM: dts: BCM5301X: define RTL8365MB switch on Asus RT-AC88U") >> >> Confirmed, and now reverted as I'm already tagging the final pull requests. >> >> Arınç, Florian: Feel free to resubmit a fixed version for the "late" >> branch that Olof >> may still pick up when I'm out of office, in case this is an important >> change. Otherwise >> I guess we can leave it for 5.18 > > Will do, thanks and sorry about not catching this earlier, I did not see > it it in the build log somehow.
| |