Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/sgx: Add accounting for tracking overcommit | From | Dave Hansen <> | Date | Wed, 22 Dec 2021 06:21:45 -0800 |
| |
On 12/20/21 1:35 PM, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote: > Thanks for your more detailed explanation - I will take a look at the > VM overcommit limits. Since obviously the original implementation did > have a default value set, I had still a remaining specific question > about your comments. Are you suggesting that there should not be a way > to override any overcommit limit at all? So drop the parameter all > together?
Yes, let's kill the exposed tunable.
We don't have any strong, practical need for it at the moment other than paranoia.
| |