Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] block/elevator: handle possible null pointer | From | Jens Axboe <> | Date | Tue, 21 Dec 2021 08:26:26 -0700 |
| |
On 12/21/21 1:10 AM, Peng Hao wrote: > There is a check for q->tag_set in the front of elevator_get_default, > and there should be a check here too.
I always get suspicious when I see patches like that. Is the other check valid? Why does it need to get checked? There's really no meat on the bone in this commit message.
-- Jens Axboe
| |