lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/3] irqchip: Pass platform_device pointer to init_cb
From
Date
On 12/2/21 4:21 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> It makes sense to just pass device_node for callback in IRQCHIP_DECLARE
> case, but not so much for IRQCHIP_PLATFORM_DRIVER one, because
> platform_driver probe/init usually needs device pointer for various
> purposes, e.g. resource allocation, service request, device prefixed
> message output, etc. Create a new callback type irqchip_init_cb_t which
> takes platform_device pointer as parameter, and update the existing
> IRQCHIP_PLATFORM_DRIVER users accordingly.
>
> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>

Could you copy all recipients on all 3 patches plus your cover letter
next time so we have the full context? Thanks!

[snip]

>
> -static int __init bcm7120_l2_intc_probe_7120(struct device_node *dn,
> +static int __init bcm7120_l2_intc_probe_7120(struct platform_device *pdev,
> struct device_node *parent)
> {
> - return bcm7120_l2_intc_probe(dn, parent, bcm7120_l2_intc_iomap_7120,
> + return bcm7120_l2_intc_probe(pdev->dev.of_node, parent,
> + bcm7120_l2_intc_iomap_7120,
> "BCM7120 L2");

If you look further into that driver, you will see that we do something
like this in bcm7120_l2_intc_probe:

pdev = of_find_device_by_node(dn);
if (!pdev) {
ret = -ENODEV;
goto out_free_data;
}

which would be completely superfluous now that we pass a platform_device
directly. Can you rework your patch so as to eliminate that
of_find_device_by_ndoe() (and the companion put_device call)?
--
Florian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-02 18:53    [W:0.124 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site