lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next] net: prestera: flower template support
From
On 2021-12-02 10:50, Volodymyr Mytnyk wrote:
> From: Volodymyr Mytnyk<vmytnyk@marvell.com>
>
> Add user template explicit support. At this moment, max
> TCAM rule size is utilized for all rules, doesn't matter
> which and how much flower matches are provided by user. It
> means that some of TCAM space is wasted, which impacts
> the number of filters that can be offloaded.
>
> Introducing the template, allows to have more HW offloaded
> filters.
>
> Example:
> tc qd add dev PORT clsact
> tc chain add dev PORT ingress protocol ip \
> flower dst_ip 0.0.0.0/16

"chain" or "filter"?

> tc filter add dev PORT ingress protocol ip \
> flower skip_sw dst_ip 1.2.3.4/16 action drop

You are not using tc priority? Above will result in two priorities
(the 0.0.0.0 entry will be more important) and in classical flower
approach two different tables.
I am wondering how you map the table to the TCAM.
Is the priority sorting entirely based on masks in hardware?

cheers,
jamal

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-02 18:27    [W:0.093 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site