lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 9p: Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote on Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 09:25:47AM +0000:
> From: Zhang Mingyu <zhang.mingyu@zte.com.cn>
>
> This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Mingyu <zhang.mingyu@zte.com.cn>

I realize I've never replied to this mail when applying old patches now,
I've picked this up too.

> ---
> fs/9p/vfs_file.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
> index 4244d48398ef..f2375448cafc 100644
> --- a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
> @@ -139,8 +139,7 @@ static int v9fs_file_do_lock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
> fid = filp->private_data;
> BUG_ON(fid == NULL);
>
> - if ((fl->fl_flags & FL_POSIX) != FL_POSIX)
> - BUG();
> + BUG_ON((fl->fl_flags & FL_POSIX) != FL_POSIX);
>
> res = locks_lock_file_wait(filp, fl);
> if (res < 0)

--
Dominique

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-18 12:17    [W:0.037 / U:0.808 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site