lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the nfs-anna tree with the fscache tree
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 7:35 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the nfs-anna tree got conflicts in:
>
> fs/nfs/fscache.c
> fs/nfs/fscache.h
> fs/nfs/fscache-index.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 882ff66585ec ("nfs: Convert to new fscache volume/cookie API")
>
> from the fscache tree and commits:
>
> e89edabcb3d4 ("NFS: Remove remaining usages of NFSDBG_FSCACHE")
> 0d20bd7faac9 ("NFS: Cleanup usage of nfs_inode in fscache interface and handle i_size properly")
> 4a0574909596 ("NFS: Rename fscache read and write pages functions")
> 3b779545aa01 ("NFS: Convert NFS fscache enable/disable dfprintks to tracepoints")
> b9077ca60a13 ("NFS: Replace dfprintks with tracepoints in fscache read and write page functions")
> 416de7e7eeb6 ("NFS: Remove remaining dfprintks related to fscache cookies")
> fcb692b98976 ("NFS: Use nfs_i_fscache() consistently within NFS fscache code")
>
Anna, feel free to drop these from your tree to avoid the conflicts
with the rest of your tree and dhowells fscache-rewrite patchset.



> from the nfs-anna tree.
>
> I had no idea how to fix this all up, so I just dropped the nfs-anna
> tree for today. Please get together and coordinate thses changes.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-17 12:41    [W:0.048 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site