lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/4] memory: omap-gpmc: Use a compatible match table when checking for NAND controller
From
Date


On 17/12/2021 17:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/12/2021 11:29, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> As more compatibles can be added to the GPMC NAND controller driver
>> use a compatible match table.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 8 +++++++-
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c | 2 +-
>> include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h | 5 +++++
>> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
>> index 624153048182..814ddb45c13d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
>> @@ -2091,6 +2091,7 @@ static int gpmc_probe_generic_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> u32 val;
>> struct gpio_desc *waitpin_desc = NULL;
>> struct gpmc_device *gpmc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> + bool is_nand = false;
>>
>> if (of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &cs) < 0) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%pOF has no 'reg' property\n",
>> @@ -2183,7 +2184,12 @@ static int gpmc_probe_generic_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "ti,omap2-nand")) {
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP2)
>
> if (IS_ENABLED()) is preferred. If needed, you could make omap_nand_ids
> symbol visible always (so without ifdef around it), because extern
> structure should not have impact when not defined (if I recall
> correctly...).

OK.

>
>> + if (of_match_node(omap_nand_ids, child))
>> + is_nand = true;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + if (is_nand) {
>> /* NAND specific setup */
>> val = 8;
>> of_property_read_u32(child, "nand-bus-width", &val);
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c
>> index b26d4947af02..fff834ee726f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c
>> @@ -2352,7 +2352,7 @@ static int omap_nand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static const struct of_device_id omap_nand_ids[] = {
>> +const struct of_device_id omap_nand_ids[] = {
>> { .compatible = "ti,omap2-nand", },
>> {},
>> };
>
> I think OMAP2 NAND driver can be a module, so this should have
> EXPORT_SYMBOL.

Indeed. Good catch!
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h b/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h
>> index de6ada739121..e1bb90a8db03 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h
>> @@ -61,4 +61,9 @@ struct gpmc_nand_regs {
>> void __iomem *gpmc_bch_result5[GPMC_BCH_NUM_REMAINDER];
>> void __iomem *gpmc_bch_result6[GPMC_BCH_NUM_REMAINDER];
>> };
>> +
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP2)
>> +extern const struct of_device_id omap_nand_ids[];
>> +#endif
>> +
>> #endif
>>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

cheers,
-roger

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-17 22:34    [W:0.094 / U:0.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site