[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/3] ARM: mstar: Initial Miyoo Mini support
Hi Daniel,

Le jeu. 16 déc. 2021 à 17:15, Daniel Palmer <> a écrit :
> Hi Romain,
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 00:53, Romain Perier <> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Le jeu. 16 déc. 2021 à 11:52, Daniel Palmer <> a écrit :
> >>
> >> - I've left the link tags as-is as using them for linking
> >> to background info seems acceptable.
> >
> >
> >
> The explanation of Link seem to have been updated recently in
> 1f57bd42b77cdc4b8e05ba9f4417872a6691b66d
> (
> a few paragraphs down).
> My reading of the paragraph since that commit is: Explain what the
> commit does in the commit message. If there is a bug that prompted the
> change then link it. If there is some background for the commit then
> link it.
> If it needs to be changed around I'll do that but I personally think
> it looks nicer. It seems like the right way to provide links to
> datasheets etc without putting a bunch of long messy urls into the
> commit message.

Well, I agree it is confusing. So I have discussed privately about
this with Arnd (on IRC):

<rperier> What is the real usage of the "Link:" tag ? it is mainly
used as background informations for referencing archives or patches on
lore.k.o , but it can also be used for referencing something else or
not ?
(like information for a board)
<arnd> right, it's pretty much never wrong to add a Link: tag for the
patch submission that was picked up, but you can also add it for any
other reference, e.g.issue trackers or datasheets that may be relevant


Which replies to the question, so it is okay for me ;)


 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-16 18:35    [W:0.068 / U:0.744 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site