Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Dec 2021 14:17:44 +0100 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] LICENSES/LGPL-2.1: Add LGPL-2.1-or-later as valid identifiers |
| |
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 08:30:14PM +0800, Cai Huoqing wrote: > On 16 12月 21 13:17:35, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Some files have been flagged with the new LGPL-2.1-or-later > > identifier which replace the original LGPL-2.1+ in the SPDX license > > identifier specification, but the identifiers are not mentioned as > > valid in the LGPL-2.1 license file. > > > > Add it, together with the LGPL-2.1-only at the the license file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> > > --- > > LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 b/LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 > > index 27bb4342a3e8..b73f9b6230f5 100644 > > --- a/LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 > > +++ b/LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 > > @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ > > Valid-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1 > > +Valid-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-only > > Valid-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1+ > > +Valid-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later > > SPDX-URL: https://spdx.org/licenses/LGPL-2.1.html > The URL is deprecated, do we need to update it together.
No.
> The same, GPL-2.0, LGPL-2.0
Again, no. We are using an older version of the SPDX specification, this is fine.
thanks,
greg k-h
| |