lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the kvm tree
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in:

arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c

between commit:

27592ae8dbe4 ("KVM: Move wiping of the kvm->vcpus array to common code")

from the kvm tree and commit:

52b28657ebd7 ("KVM: arm64: pkvm: Unshare guest structs during teardown")

from the kvm-arm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 7385bbdfdc42,6057f3c5aafe..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@@ -179,7 -181,15 +179,9 @@@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kv

kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);

- for (i = 0; i < KVM_MAX_VCPUS; ++i) {
- if (kvm->vcpus[i]) {
- kvm_vcpu_destroy(kvm->vcpus[i]);
- kvm->vcpus[i] = NULL;
- }
- }
- atomic_set(&kvm->online_vcpus, 0);
+ kvm_destroy_vcpus(kvm);
+
+ kvm_unshare_hyp(kvm, kvm + 1);
}

int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-17 05:19    [W:0.026 / U:0.576 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site