[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] extcon: fix extcon_get_extcon_dev() error handling
On 12/16/21 5:05 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 05:24:30PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 12/16/21 4:52 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 03:39:46PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>> First of all, sorry for late reply.
>>>> There is one issue. About this issue, I already discussed on patch[1]
>>>> [1]
>>>> extcon_get_extcon_dev() is used for anywhere except for probe step.
>>>> But EPROBE_DEFER is only used on probe step.
>>>> So that it is not clear to return EPROBE_DEFER from extcon_get_extcon_dev()
>>>> because extcon_get_extcon_dev() never know either call it on probe function
>>>> or not.
>>> Currently extcon_get_extcon_dev() is only called from probe so it's not
>>> an issue.
>> Even if extcon_get_extcon_dev() is used on probe until now,
>> it is possible to use on anywhere as I commented.
>> It is difficult to agree this approach without any other solution.
>> Basically, the subsystem core never know either probe time or not.
>> It means that this issue should be handled in each device driver.
> To be honest, I'm not sure how this differs from other functions which
> return -EPROBE_DEFER. How do other functions guarantee they will only
> be called from probe()?

If it is possible to know extcon_get_extcon_dev() will be only callled on probe,
it is no problem. But, it is not able to guarantee that extcon_get_extcon_dev()
is called on probe. Because of this reason, this issue should be handled in each device driver.

-EPROBE_DEFER is only for probe step. If return -EPROBE_DEFER except for probe,
it is wrong return value.

> regards,
> dan carpenter

Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-16 09:16    [W:0.143 / U:1.688 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site