lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/9] Parallel CPU bringup for x86_64


On 16 December 2021 19:55:36 GMT, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> wrote:
>On 12/16/21 1:52 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Thu, 2021-12-16 at 10:27 -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>> On 12/15/21 8:56 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>>
>>>> Doing the INIT/SIPI/SIPI in parallel for all APs and *then* waiting for
>>>> them shaves about 80% off the AP bringup time on a 96-thread socket
>>>> Skylake box (EC2 c5.metal) — from about 500ms to 100ms.
>>>>
>>>> There are more wins to be had with further parallelisation, but this is
>>>> the simple part.
>>>
>>> I applied this series and began booting a regular non-SEV guest and hit a
>>> failure at 39 vCPUs. No panic or warning, just a reset and OVMF was
>>> executing again. I'll try to debug what's going, but not sure how quickly
>>> I'll arrive at anything.
>>
>> I've pushed the SEV-ES fix to
>> https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux.git/shortlog/refs/heads/parallel-5.16
>> and in doing so I've moved the 'no_parallel_bringup' command line
>> argument earlier in the series, to Thomas's "Support parallel startup
>> of secondary CPUs" commit (now 191f0899757). It would be interesting to
>> see if you can reproduce with just that much, both with and with
>> no_parallel_bringup. And then whether the subsequent commit that
>> actually enables the parallel INIT/SIPI/SIPI actually makes the
>> difference?
>>
>
>I'll pull it down and give it try.

Thanks. Note: don't use the whole thing; that last "parallel part2" patch in particular isn't ready. And probably isn't where the next low-hanging fruit is anyway.

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-16 21:01    [W:0.236 / U:1.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site