lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: remove ARRAY_SIZE defines from tests
From
Date
On 12/16/21 12:30 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 6:42 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/15/21 9:04 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:27 PM Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 12/11/21 6:53 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 9:34 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ARRAY_SIZE is defined in multiple test files. Remove the definitions
>>>>>> and include header file for the define instead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Remove ARRAY_SIZE define and add include bpf_util.h to bring in the
>>>>>> define.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c | 5 +----
>>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h | 5 +----
>>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_loop1.c | 5 +----
>>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_loop2.c | 4 +---
>>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_prog.c | 5 +----
>>>>>> 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c
>>>>>> index 1d8918dfbd3f..7a5ebd330689 100644
>>>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c
>>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c
>>>>>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>>>>>> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
>>>>>> #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
>>>>>> #include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
>>>>>> +#include <bpf/bpf_util.h>
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't look like you've built it.
>>>>>
>>>>> progs/test_sysctl_prog.c:11:10: fatal error: 'bpf/bpf_util.h' file not found
>>>>> #include <bpf/bpf_util.h>
>>>>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> CLNG-BPF [test_maps] socket_cookie_prog.o
>>>>> progs/test_sysctl_loop2.c:11:10: fatal error: 'bpf/bpf_util.h' file not found
>>>>> #include <bpf/bpf_util.h>
>>>>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> 1 error generated.
>>>>> In file included from progs/profiler2.c:6:
>>>>> progs/profiler.inc.h:7:10: fatal error: 'bpf/bpf_util.h' file not found
>>>>> #include <bpf/bpf_util.h>
>>>>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry about that. I built it - I think something is wrong in my env. Build
>>>> fails complaining about not finding vmlinux - I overlooked that the failure
>>>> happened before it got to progs.
>>>>
>>>> Error: failed to load BTF from .../vmlinux: No such file or directory
>>>
>>> Please make sure that you build vmlinux before you build selftests,
>>> BPF selftests use vmlinux to generate vmlinux.h with all kernel types
>>> (among other things). So please also make sure that all the setting in
>>> selftests/bpf/config were used in your Kconfig.
>>>
>>>>
>>
>> The problem in my env. is that I don't have CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF in
>> my config and then don't have the dwarves and llvm-strip on my system.
>> Pains of upgrading.
>>
>> I am all set now. On the other hand the vmlinux.h is a mess. It has
>> no guards for defines and including stdio.h and this generated
>> vmlinux.h causes all sorts of problems.
>
> It does have
>
> #ifndef __VMLINUX_H__
> #define __VMLINUX_H__
>
> Are we talking about the same vmlinux.h here?
>

Yes we are. The guard it has works when vmlinux.h is included
twice. It defines a lot of common defines which are the problem.
Unless you add guards around each one of them, including vmlinux.h
is problematic if you also include other standard includes.

You can try to include bpf_util.h for example from one of the
test in progs to see the problem.

thanks,
-- Shuah

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-16 20:52    [W:0.100 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site