Messages in this thread | | | From | Nitesh Lal <> | Date | Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:54:40 -0500 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] genirq: Cleanup the abuse of irq_set_affinity_hint() |
| |
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 1:44 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 10 2021 at 08:51, Nitesh Lal wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 5:16 PM Nitesh Lal <nilal@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > The more general question is whether I should queue all the others or > >> > whether some subsystem would prefer to pull in a tagged commit on top of > >> > rc1. I'm happy to carry them all of course. > >> > > >> > >> I am fine either way. > >> In the past, while I was asking for more testing help I was asked if the > >> SCSI changes are part of Martins's scsi-fixes tree as that's something > >> Broadcom folks test to check for regression. > >> So, maybe Martin can pull this up? > >> > > > > Gentle ping. > > Any thoughts on the above query? > > As nobody cares, I'll pick it up. >
Sounds good to me. Thank you!
-- Nitesh
| |