lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 06/25] reboot: Warn if unregister_restart_handler() fails
From
Date
10.12.2021 21:32, Rafael J. Wysocki пишет:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 7:02 PM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Emit warning if unregister_restart_handler() fails since it never should
>> fail. This will ease further API development by catching mistakes early.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/reboot.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/reboot.c b/kernel/reboot.c
>> index e6659ae329f1..f0e7b9c13f6b 100644
>> --- a/kernel/reboot.c
>> +++ b/kernel/reboot.c
>> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_restart_handler);
>> */
>> int unregister_restart_handler(struct notifier_block *nb)
>> {
>> - return atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&restart_handler_list, nb);
>> + return WARN_ON(atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&restart_handler_list, nb));
>
> The only reason why it can fail is if the object pointed to by nb is
> not in the chain.

I had exactly this case where object wasn't in the chain due to a bug
and this warning was very helpful.

> Why WARN() about this? And what about systems with
> panic_on_warn set?

That warning condition will never happen normally, only when something
is seriously wrong.

Those systems with panic_on_warn will get what was they asked for.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-10 19:55    [W:0.127 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site