lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: Fix a comment in cpufreq_policy_free
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 8:19 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 01-12-21, 15:40, Tang Yizhou wrote:
> > Make the comment of blocking_notifier_call_chain() easier to
> > understand.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <tangyizhou@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index e338d2f010fe..db0b4b4258d5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -1296,8 +1296,9 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >
> > if (policy->max_freq_req) {
> > /*
> > - * CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification is sent only after
> > - * successfully adding max_freq_req request.
> > + * Remove max_freq_req after sending CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY
> > + * notification, since CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification was
> > + * sent after adding max_freq_req earlier.
> > */
> > blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
> > CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY, policy);
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Applied as 5.16-rc material along with the [2/2[, thanks!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-01 20:05    [W:0.265 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site