lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: Fix a comment in cpufreq_policy_free
On 01-12-21, 15:40, Tang Yizhou wrote:
> Make the comment of blocking_notifier_call_chain() easier to
> understand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <tangyizhou@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index e338d2f010fe..db0b4b4258d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1296,8 +1296,9 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> if (policy->max_freq_req) {
> /*
> - * CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification is sent only after
> - * successfully adding max_freq_req request.
> + * Remove max_freq_req after sending CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY
> + * notification, since CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification was
> + * sent after adding max_freq_req earlier.
> */
> blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
> CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY, policy);

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

--
viresh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-01 08:21    [W:0.038 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site