lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v11 2/6] gpiolib: allow to specify the firmware node in struct gpio_chip
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 03:36:29PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:34 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:28:19PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:53:42PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 2:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:11:28PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:04 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:

> > > > Drop this patch and drop the line where the fwnode is assigned in
> > > > gpio-sim.c. Then probe the device and print the addresses of the
> > > > parent and child swnodes. See how they are the same and don't match
> > > > the swnode hierarchy we created. You can then apply this patch and see
> > > > how it becomes correct.
> > >
> > > Thanks. I will give a spin.
> > >
> > > Note, it seems I have to revert your older code first...
> >
> > Okay, I have to postpone because simple revert doesn't work for me.
> > Can you clean up the next, please and I can use it starting from tomorrow?
> >
> >
> > $ git tag --contains 5065e08e4ef3
> > DONT-USE-next-20211105
> > next-20211101
> > next-20211102
> > next-20211103
> > next-20211104
> > next-20211105
> > next-20211106
> > next-20211108
> > next-20211109
> > next-20211110
> > next-20211111
> > next-20211112
> > next-20211115
> > next-20211116
> > next-20211117
> > next-20211118
> > next-20211123
> > next-20211124
> > next-20211125
> > next-20211126
> > next-20211129
> > next-20211130
> > next-20211201

> None of this is in next, please use:
> https://github.com/brgl/linux/tree/topic/gpio-sim-v12 if you want a
> branch.

It the old version that prevents me to apply (my branches based on next).

> I just thought you were going to simply apply these patches.

That's correct, but see above.

Anyway, I'm already switched tasks for today. Maybe I will have some time
later on.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-01 15:57    [W:0.053 / U:1.848 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site