lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v15 1/8] dt-bindings: mfd: Initial commit of silergy,sy7636a.yaml
Hi,

[...]
> > > This is a vcom in the sense of voltage for compensation. We just
> > > currently don't support setting the vcom.
> > >
> > > I had a look at the Kobo code and this is similar to
> > > https://github.com/akemnade/linux/blob/kobo/epdc-pmic-5.15/drivers/regulator/sy7636-regulator.c#L614
> > >
> > > So I think that vcom is still the appropriate name for this.
> > >
> > seems that you did not get me. If I understand the code behind it
> > correctly, it turns on all power rails (the +-15V stuff, VEE and so on)
> > with the defined delays, not just vcom because it sets
> > SY7636A_OPERATION_MODE_CRL_ONOFF. Controlling VCOM separately is possible
> > by using SY7636A_OPERATION_MODE_CRL_VCOMCTL in combintion with a
> > vcom_en gpio.
> >
> > I do not see a reason to turn on vcom only without the other higher
> > voltage rails, so the behaviour is not necessarily wrong but if I read
> > the binding documentation I would expect that just vcom is turned on.
> > That is the mismatch I am talking about.
>
> Ah! Ok I understand. I'll rename it to vdd then.
>
Most important is IMHO some human-readable description in the bindings
document.

I am also just wondering whether this kind of logical
regulator which turns on several other regulators is actually accepted
or just slipped through review. I have no strong opinion here. I just
want to be able to clean up the tps65185 driver in the same way and not
having two similar pmics with different bindings and then a mess at the
consumer side.

Regards,
Andreas

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-01 23:37    [W:0.069 / U:2.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site