Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source
Date
Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:35:29 +0000
On 05.11.2021 23:47, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> I think actually I will drop this patch series because apparently >> lan966x works fine also with the peripheral clock. So then no changes >> are required. > > Not even patch 1/2? >
we can keep the new compatible, but patch 2/2 needs to be split.