lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next] devlink: Require devlink lock during device reload
On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 07:16:05PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 04:11:22PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 22:52:19 +0200 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > > > >Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > > >
> > > > Looks fine to me.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
> > >
> > > Traces from mlxsw / netdevsim below:
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the testing Ido!
> >
> > Would you mind giving my RFC a spin as well on your syzbot machinery?

<...>

> >
> > (3) should we let drivers take refs on the devlink instance?
>
> I think it's fine mainly because I don't expect it to be used by too
> many drivers other than netdevsim which is somewhat special. Looking at
> the call sites of devlink_get() in netdevsim, it is only called from
> places (debugfs and trap workqueue) that shouldn't be present in real
> drivers.

Sorry, I'm obligated to ask. In which universe is it ok to create new
set of API that no real driver should use?

Thanks

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-07 18:55    [W:0.095 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site