lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] tty: vt: keyboard: do not copy an extra-byte in copy_to_user
From
On 11/6/21 23:44, Ajay Garg wrote:
>> >
>> > That's the whole point of the discussion :)
>> >
>> > The method "vt_do_kdgkb_ioctl" does not manage "func_table[kb_func]".
>> > Thus, the method does not know whether or not
>> > strlen(func_table[kb_func]) < sizeof(user_kdgkb->kb_string).
>> >
>>
>> It manages. The code under `case KDSKBSENT:` sets func_table[] entries
>> via vt_kdskbsent().
>>
>> kbs = strndup_user(..., sizeof(user_kdgkb->kb_string));
>>
>> is used to allocate buffer for the func_table[] entry. That's my main
>> point :)
>
> func_table is set in vt_kdskbent, which itself is external.
>
> More importantly, vt_kdskbent is handled in case KDSKBSENT:, while the
> strlcpy issue we are dealing with is in case KDGKBSENT:
> In case KDGKBSENT, following are managed :
>
> ssize_t len = sizeof(user_kdgkb->kb_string);
> kbs = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> while func_table[kb_func] is external entity here, so no assumption
> ought to be made for it, just my 2 cents though :)
>
> Anyhow, really, it is the maintainers' choice now :), since there
> isn't a burning (compilation/runtime) issue.
>

I fully agree here, it's maintainer's choice. Let's sit down and wait
what experienced people thing about this :)

I've just wanted to explain my idea better to exclude possible
misunderstanding.

Thanks



With regards,
Pavel Skripkin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-06 21:49    [W:0.817 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site