lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] perf evsel: Fix missing exclude_{host,guest} setting
Em Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 11:00:29AM -0700, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:22 AM Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The current logic for the perf missing feature has a bug that it can
> > > wrongly clear some modifiers like G or H. Actually some PMUs don't
> > > support any filtering or exclusion while others do. But we check it
> > > as a global feature.
> >
> > (Sorry to pitch in bit late)
> >
> > AMD has one more problem on a similar line. On AMD, non-precise and
> > precise sampling are provided by core and IBS pmu respectively. Plus,
> > core pmu has filtering capability but IBS does not. Perf by default
> > sets precise_ip=3 and exclude_guest=1 and goes on decreasing precise_ip
> > with exclude_guest set until perf_event_open() succeeds. This is
> > causing perf to always fallback to core pmu (non-precise mode) even if
> > it's perfectly feasible to do precise sampling. Do you guys think this
> > problem should also be addressed while designing solution for Namhyung's
> > patch or solve it seperately like below patch:
> >
> > ---><---
> >
> > From 48808299679199c39ff737a30a7f387669314fd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
> > Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 11:01:12 +0530
> > Subject: [PATCH] perf/amd/ibs: Don't set exclude_guest by default
> >
> > Perf tool sets exclude_guest by default while calling perf_event_open().
> > Because IBS does not have filtering capability, it always gets rejected
> > by IBS PMU driver and thus perf falls back to non-precise sampling. Fix
> > it by not setting exclude_guest by default on AMD.
> >
> > Before:
> > $ sudo ./perf record -C 0 -vvv true |& grep precise
> > precise_ip 3
> > decreasing precise_ip by one (2)
> > precise_ip 2
> > decreasing precise_ip by one (1)
> > precise_ip 1
> > decreasing precise_ip by one (0)
> >
> > After:
> > $ sudo ./perf record -C 0 -vvv true |& grep precise
> > precise_ip 3
> > decreasing precise_ip by one (2)
> > precise_ip 2
> >
> > Reported-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
>
> It'd be nice if it can cover explicit -e cycles:pp as well. Anyway,

Ravi, please consider Namhyung's request, a patch on top as I'm adding
this already.

> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-06 20:25    [W:0.129 / U:1.624 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site