Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:38:03 -0700 | From | Ira Weiny <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] mm/highmem: Remove deprecated kmap_atomic |
| |
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 05:23:11PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 09:58:59AM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 04:51:40PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:50:37PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 03:56:25PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:33:07 -0800 Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > This already has my signed off by so I'm not going to 'review'. With Prathu's > > > > > > testing information I hope this can land. > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew did you see this patch? > > > > > > > > > > I did now ;) > > > > > > > > > > Tossed onto the post-rc1 pile, thanks, > > > > > > > > This patch seems to have slipped through the gaps for a couple of cycles > > > > now? I found a missed spot in it for CONFIG_HIGHMEM: > > > > > > Ugh, sorry, wrong version of the patch. > > > > Check! Yea this works for me... > > > > I think this should to through as a separate patch because Prathu's has been > > soaking for some time. No need to complicate it with this. > > This isn't "complicating Prathu's patch". This is "fixing up the bit > that Prathu missed with his patch". zero_user_segments() should not > have different rules on HIGHMEM and non-HIGHMEM kernels. What do you mean by 'different rules'?
Oh I see... Ok yea.
Well this should not be a big deal...
Ira
| |