lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: separate the common code from machine driver
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 12:11:55PM +0800, Trevor Wu wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 15:39 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I don't follow why the DSP support requires a new driver? Shouldn't
> > all
> > systems with the DSP present be using it?

> We need to keep the solution without DSP, so we can replace DSP
> solution with non-DSP when it's required. But when we introduce SOF for
> DSP control, there will be more routes in machine driver and device
> tree usage is different from the original. So it's hard to share the
> same driver for these two solutions.

We shouldn't be requiring people to load completely different drivers
based on software configuration, what if a system wants to bypass the
DSP in some but not all configurations? Can we not just have controls
allowing users to route round the DSP where appropriate?
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-05 16:40    [W:0.056 / U:0.720 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site