Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 5 Nov 2021 15:38:51 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: separate the common code from machine driver |
| |
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 12:11:55PM +0800, Trevor Wu wrote: > On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 15:39 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I don't follow why the DSP support requires a new driver? Shouldn't > > all > > systems with the DSP present be using it?
> We need to keep the solution without DSP, so we can replace DSP > solution with non-DSP when it's required. But when we introduce SOF for > DSP control, there will be more routes in machine driver and device > tree usage is different from the original. So it's hard to share the > same driver for these two solutions.
We shouldn't be requiring people to load completely different drivers based on software configuration, what if a system wants to bypass the DSP in some but not all configurations? Can we not just have controls allowing users to route round the DSP where appropriate? [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |