lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 02/11] locking: Remove rt_rwlock_is_contended().
Date
rt_rwlock_is_contended() has not users. It makes no sense to use it as
rwlock_is_contended() because it is a sleeping lock on RT and preemption
is possible. It reports always != 0 if used by a writer and even if
there is a waiter then the lock might not be handed over if the
current owner has the highest priority.

Remove rt_rwlock_is_contended().

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
index b2e553f9255bf..9e396a09fe0fd 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
@@ -257,12 +257,6 @@ void __sched rt_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_unlock);

-int __sched rt_rwlock_is_contended(rwlock_t *rwlock)
-{
- return rw_base_is_contended(&rwlock->rwbase);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_rwlock_is_contended);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
void __rt_rwlock_init(rwlock_t *rwlock, const char *name,
struct lock_class_key *key)
--
2.34.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-29 23:54    [W:1.868 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site