lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/7] net: dsa: b53: Expose PTP timestamping ioctls to userspace
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 06:48:24AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 04:27:03PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 06:05:34AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > > switch (cfg.rx_filter) {
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE:
> > > break;
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL:
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME:
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_EVENT:
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_SYNC:
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_DELAY_REQ:
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NTP_ALL:
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_EVENT:
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_SYNC:
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L4_DELAY_REQ:
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_EVENT:
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_SYNC:
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_DELAY_REQ:
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT:
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_SYNC:
> > > case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_DELAY_REQ:
> > > cfg.rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT;
> > > break;
> > > default:
> > > mutex_unlock(&ocelot->ptp_lock);
> > > return -ERANGE;
> > > }
> > >
> > > That is essentially an upgrade to HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT. The
> > > change from ALL to HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT is probably a simple
> > > oversight, and the driver can be easily fixed.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Richard
> >
> > It's essentially the same pattern as what Martin is introducing for b53.
>
> Uh, no it isn't. The present patch has:
>
> + case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_EVENT:
> + case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_SYNC:
> + case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_DELAY_REQ:
> + case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT:
> + case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_SYNC:
> + case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_DELAY_REQ:
> + case HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL:
> + config->rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_EVENT;
>
> There is an important difference between
> HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_L2_EVENT and HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT
>
> Notice the "L2" in there.

Richard, when the request is PTP_V2_EVENT and the response is
PTP_V2_L2_EVENT, is that an upgrade or a downgrade? PTP_V2_EVENT also
includes PTP_V2_L4_EVENT.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-25 18:20    [W:0.119 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site