lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [norov:bitmap-tmp 7/8] arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c:472:64: error: expected ')' before 'return'
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:43:48AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 03:17 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > tree: https://github.com/norov/linux bitmap-tmp
> > head: 75ee333c81c999b29a49810611fb160cec32217d
> > commit: 29f49f10b3fbef5a88db0a7e370984297616f0fa [7/8] lib/cpumask: replace cpumask_weight with cpumask_{empty,gt,le,eq}
> > config: powerpc-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211126/202111260340.kCOW9xsR-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > compiler: powerpc-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > # https://github.com/norov/linux/commit/29f49f10b3fbef5a88db0a7e370984297616f0fa
> > git remote add norov https://github.com/norov/linux
> > git fetch --no-tags norov bitmap-tmp
> > git checkout 29f49f10b3fbef5a88db0a7e370984297616f0fa
> > # save the config file to linux build tree
> > mkdir build_dir
> > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=powerpc SHELL=/bin/bash
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c: In function 'wait_for_other_cpus':
> > > > arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c:472:64: error: expected ')' before 'return'
> > 472 | if (cpumask_weight_gt(&cpus_in_xmon, ncpus - 1)
> > | ~ ^
> > | )
> > 473 | return true;
> > | ~~~~~~
> > > > arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c:476:9: error: expected expression before '}' token
> > 476 | }
> > | ^
>
> It's always good to compile test patches before submitting them and:

As you can check, I didn't submit this patch. I pushed a series to my github,
and Intel 0-day bot tested it, and apparently found missed ')'.

I love this service, thank you Intel.

> > vim +472 arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
> >
> > 465
> > 466 static bool wait_for_other_cpus(int ncpus)
> > 467 {
> > 468 unsigned long timeout;
> > 469
> > 470 /* We wait for 2s, which is a metric "little while" */
> > 471 for (timeout = 20000; timeout != 0; --timeout) {
> > > 472 if (cpumask_weight_gt(&cpus_in_xmon, ncpus - 1)
> > 473 return true;
> > 474 udelay(100);
>
> unrelated trivia:
>
> It seeems this loop could consume a lot of cpu/power.
>
> Could this use usleep_range() or maybe something else that doesn't allow
> rescheduling on another cpu?
>
> Maybe it should be something like
>
> unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(2000);
>
> while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> if (cpumask_weight_gt(&cpus_in_xmon, ncpus - 1)
> return true;
> usleep_range(100, 200);
> }
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-26 04:59    [W:0.060 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site