Messages in this thread | | | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] genirq: Cleanup the abuse of irq_set_affinity_hint() | Date | Wed, 24 Nov 2021 20:30:01 +0100 |
| |
Nitesh,
On Mon, Sep 13 2021 at 10:34, Nitesh Lal wrote: > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:25 AM Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> The drivers currently rely on irq_set_affinity_hint() to either set the >> affinity_hint that is consumed by the userspace and/or to enforce a custom >> affinity. >> >> irq_set_affinity_hint() as the name suggests is originally introduced to >> only set the affinity_hint to help the userspace in guiding the interrupts >> and not the affinity itself. However, since the commit >> >> e2e64a932556 "genirq: Set initial affinity in irq_set_affinity_hint()"
sorry for ignoring this. It fell through the cracks.
>> Thomas Gleixner (1): >> genirq: Provide new interfaces for affinity hints
Did I actually write this?
> Any suggestions on what should be the next steps here? Unfortunately, I haven't > been able to get any reviews on the following two patches: > be2net: Use irq_update_affinity_hint > hinic: Use irq_set_affinity_and_hint > > One option would be to proceed with the remaining patches and I can try > posting these two again when I post patches for the remaining drivers?
The more general question is whether I should queue all the others or whether some subsystem would prefer to pull in a tagged commit on top of rc1. I'm happy to carry them all of course.
Thanks,
tglx
| |