lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 00/14] genirq: Cleanup the abuse of irq_set_affinity_hint()
    Date
    Nitesh,

    On Mon, Sep 13 2021 at 10:34, Nitesh Lal wrote:
    > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:25 AM Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> The drivers currently rely on irq_set_affinity_hint() to either set the
    >> affinity_hint that is consumed by the userspace and/or to enforce a custom
    >> affinity.
    >>
    >> irq_set_affinity_hint() as the name suggests is originally introduced to
    >> only set the affinity_hint to help the userspace in guiding the interrupts
    >> and not the affinity itself. However, since the commit
    >>
    >> e2e64a932556 "genirq: Set initial affinity in irq_set_affinity_hint()"

    sorry for ignoring this. It fell through the cracks.

    >> Thomas Gleixner (1):
    >> genirq: Provide new interfaces for affinity hints

    Did I actually write this?

    > Any suggestions on what should be the next steps here? Unfortunately, I haven't
    > been able to get any reviews on the following two patches:
    > be2net: Use irq_update_affinity_hint
    > hinic: Use irq_set_affinity_and_hint
    >
    > One option would be to proceed with the remaining patches and I can try
    > posting these two again when I post patches for the remaining drivers?

    The more general question is whether I should queue all the others or
    whether some subsystem would prefer to pull in a tagged commit on top of
    rc1. I'm happy to carry them all of course.

    Thanks,

    tglx


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2021-11-24 20:30    [W:4.376 / U:0.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site