lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested'
    On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:15 PM André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com> wrote:
    > Às 04:49 de 24/11/21, Arnd Bergmann escreveu:
    > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 8:31 AM Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> wrote:
    > >> On 11/23/21 5:38 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
    > >> @@ -451,3 +451,4 @@
    > >> 446 common landlock_restrict_self sys_landlock_restrict_self
    > >> # 447 reserved for memfd_secret
    > >> 448 common process_mrelease sys_process_mrelease
    > >> +449 common futex_waitv sys_futex_waitv
    > >
    > > I don't know what's going on with this one, I don't actually see
    > > a reason why it isn't already wired up on all architectures. If we add
    > > this, it should probably be done for all architectures at once as a
    > > bugfix, but it's possible that this is intentionally only used on
    > > x86 and arm.
    > >
    > > André, can you comment on this?
    > >
    > I've added entries for the archs that I've actually tested, but there
    > should not be any arch-specific problems in futex_waitv. I'll submit a
    > patch to wire it up for the remaining architectures.

    Ok, thank you.

    Arnd

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2021-11-24 15:22    [W:4.030 / U:0.208 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site