Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:17:58 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree |
| |
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:26:45AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> As a second thought - do we need such a stub function at all? I guess > anyone who is actually adding a call to the > rohm_regulator_set_voltage_sel_restricted() helper should also have the > implementation selected. Failing to do so is probably indication of an > error. Compile testing could perhaps be an exception but this is > currently not supported.
> Should I just drop the stub or make it inline? Am I overlooking something?
Dropping it does seem reasonable, I can't immediately think of a case where the stub would get used. I've queued your existing patch to try to make sure that a fix lands tomorrow so (assuming no test issues) please send a removal patch on top of that. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |