Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:07:59 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] proc: "mount -o lookup=..." support | From | Stephen Brennan <> |
| |
Hi Alexey,
On 11/22/21 11:23, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > Docker implements MaskedPaths configuration option > > https://github.com/estesp/docker/blob/9c15e82f19b0ad3c5fe8617a8ec2dddc6639f40a/oci/defaults.go#L97 > > to disable certain /proc files. It does overmount with /dev/null per > masked file. > > Give them proper mount option which selectively disables lookup/readdir > so that MaskedPaths doesn't need to be updated as time goes on. > > Syntax is > > mount -t proc proc -o lookup=cpuinfo/uptime /proc > > # ls /proc > ... > dr-xr-xr-x 8 root root 0 Nov 22 21:12 995 > -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Nov 22 21:12 cpuinfo > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Nov 22 21:12 self -> 1163 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Nov 22 21:12 thread-self -> 1163/task/1163 > -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Nov 22 21:12 uptime > > Works at top level only (1 lookup list per superblock) > Trailing slash is optional but saves 1 allocation. > > TODO: > think what to do with dcache entries across "mount -o remount,lookup=". > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> > --- > > fs/proc/generic.c | 19 +++++-- > fs/proc/internal.h | 23 +++++++++ > fs/proc/proc_net.c | 2 > fs/proc/root.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/proc_fs.h | 2 > 5 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > --- a/fs/proc/generic.c > +++ b/fs/proc/generic.c > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ struct dentry *proc_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, > * for success.. > */ > int proc_readdir_de(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx, > - struct proc_dir_entry *de) > + struct proc_dir_entry *de, const struct proc_lookup_list *ll) > { > int i; > > @@ -305,14 +305,18 @@ int proc_readdir_de(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx, > > do { > struct proc_dir_entry *next; > + > pde_get(de); > read_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock); > - if (!dir_emit(ctx, de->name, de->namelen, > - de->low_ino, de->mode >> 12)) { > - pde_put(de); > - return 0; > + > + if (ll ? in_lookup_list(ll, de->name, de->namelen) : true) {
This looks a bit odd, what about the following?
if (!ll || in_lookup_list(ll, de->name, de->namelen))
But this is maybe just a personal preference.
> + if (!dir_emit(ctx, de->name, de->namelen, de->low_ino, de->mode >> 12)) { > + pde_put(de); > + return 0; > + } > + ctx->pos++; > } > - ctx->pos++; > + > read_lock(&proc_subdir_lock); > next = pde_subdir_next(de); > pde_put(de); > @@ -330,7 +334,8 @@ int proc_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx) > if (fs_info->pidonly == PROC_PIDONLY_ON) > return 1; > > - return proc_readdir_de(file, ctx, PDE(inode)); > + return proc_readdir_de(file, ctx, PDE(inode), > + PDE(inode) == &proc_root ? fs_info->lookup_list : NULL); > } > > /* > --- a/fs/proc/internal.h > +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h > @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_register(struct proc_dir_entry *dir, > extern struct dentry *proc_lookup(struct inode *, struct dentry *, unsigned int); > struct dentry *proc_lookup_de(struct inode *, struct dentry *, struct proc_dir_entry *); > extern int proc_readdir(struct file *, struct dir_context *); > -int proc_readdir_de(struct file *, struct dir_context *, struct proc_dir_entry *); > +int proc_readdir_de(struct file *, struct dir_context *, struct proc_dir_entry *, const struct proc_lookup_list *); > > static inline void pde_get(struct proc_dir_entry *pde) > { > @@ -318,3 +318,24 @@ static inline void pde_force_lookup(struct proc_dir_entry *pde) > /* /proc/net/ entries can be changed under us by setns(CLONE_NEWNET) */ > pde->proc_dops = &proc_net_dentry_ops; > } > + > +/* > + * "cpuinfo", "uptime" is represented as > + * > + * (u8[]){ > + * 7, 'c', 'p', 'u', 'i', 'n', 'f', 'o', > + * 6, 'u', 'p', 't', 'i', 'm', 'e', > + * 0 > + * } > + */ > +struct proc_lookup_list { > + u8 len; > + char str[]; > +}; > + > +static inline struct proc_lookup_list *lookup_list_next(const struct proc_lookup_list *ll) > +{ > + return (struct proc_lookup_list *)((void *)ll + 1 + ll->len); > +} > + > +bool in_lookup_list(const struct proc_lookup_list *ll, const char *str, unsigned int len); > --- a/fs/proc/proc_net.c > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_net.c > @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static int proc_tgid_net_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx) > ret = -EINVAL; > net = get_proc_task_net(file_inode(file)); > if (net != NULL) { > - ret = proc_readdir_de(file, ctx, net->proc_net); > + ret = proc_readdir_de(file, ctx, net->proc_net, NULL); > put_net(net); > } > return ret; > --- a/fs/proc/root.c > +++ b/fs/proc/root.c > @@ -35,18 +35,22 @@ struct proc_fs_context { > enum proc_hidepid hidepid; > int gid; > enum proc_pidonly pidonly; > + struct proc_lookup_list *lookup_list; > + unsigned int lookup_list_len; > }; > > enum proc_param { > Opt_gid, > Opt_hidepid, > Opt_subset, > + Opt_lookup, > }; > > static const struct fs_parameter_spec proc_fs_parameters[] = { > fsparam_u32("gid", Opt_gid), > fsparam_string("hidepid", Opt_hidepid), > fsparam_string("subset", Opt_subset), > + fsparam_string("lookup", Opt_lookup), > {} > }; > > @@ -112,6 +116,65 @@ static int proc_parse_subset_param(struct fs_context *fc, char *value) > return 0; > } > > +static int proc_parse_lookup_param(struct fs_context *fc, char *str0) > +{ > + struct proc_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private; > + struct proc_lookup_list *ll; > + char *str; > + const char *slash; > + const char *src; > + unsigned int len; > + int rv; > + > + /* Force trailing slash, simplify loops below. */ > + len = strlen(str0); > + if (len > 0 && str0[len - 1] == '/') { > + str = str0; > + } else { > + str = kmalloc(len + 2, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!str) { > + rv = -ENOMEM; > + goto out; > + } > + memcpy(str, str0, len); > + str[len] = '/'; > + str[len + 1] = '\0'; > + } > + > + len = 0; > + for (src = str; (slash = strchr(src, '/')); src = slash + 1) { > + if (slash - src >= 256) { > + rv = -EINVAL; > + goto out_free_str; > + } > + len += 1 + (slash - src); > + } > + len += 1; > + > + ctx->lookup_list = ll = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); > + ctx->lookup_list_len = len; > + if (!ll) { > + rv = -ENOMEM; > + goto out_free_str; > + } > + > + for (src = str; (slash = strchr(src, '/')); src = slash + 1) { > + ll->len = slash - src; > + memcpy(ll->str, src, ll->len); > + ll = lookup_list_next(ll); > + } > + ll->len = 0; > + > + rv = 0; > + > +out_free_str: > + if (str != str0) { > + kfree(str); > + } > +out: > + return rv; > +} > + > static int proc_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param) > { > struct proc_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private; > @@ -137,6 +200,11 @@ static int proc_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param) > return -EINVAL; > break; > > + case Opt_lookup: > + if (proc_parse_lookup_param(fc, param->string) < 0) > + return -EINVAL; > + break; > + > default: > return -EINVAL; > } > @@ -157,6 +225,10 @@ static void proc_apply_options(struct proc_fs_info *fs_info, > fs_info->hide_pid = ctx->hidepid; > if (ctx->mask & (1 << Opt_subset)) > fs_info->pidonly = ctx->pidonly; > + if (ctx->mask & (1 << Opt_lookup)) { > + fs_info->lookup_list = ctx->lookup_list; > + ctx->lookup_list = NULL; > + } > } > > static int proc_fill_super(struct super_block *s, struct fs_context *fc) > @@ -234,11 +306,34 @@ static void proc_fs_context_free(struct fs_context *fc) > struct proc_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private; > > put_pid_ns(ctx->pid_ns); > + kfree(ctx->lookup_list); > kfree(ctx); > } > > +static int proc_fs_context_dup(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_context *src_fc) > +{ > + struct proc_fs_context *src = fc->fs_private; > + struct proc_fs_context *dst; > + > + dst = kmemdup(src, sizeof(struct proc_fs_context), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!dst) { > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + > + get_pid_ns(dst->pid_ns); > + dst->lookup_list = kmemdup(dst->lookup_list, dst->lookup_list_len, GFP_KERNEL);
If dst->lookup_list is NULL and dst->lookup_list_len is 0 (which seems to be the default state if lookup= is not passed), then kmemdup will end up calling __kmalloc_track_caller() with size 0. Each of the sl[auo]b implementations returns ZERO_SIZE_POINTER in this case, which is just ((void *)16).
This is safe to pass to kfree et al. I was worried that if ZERO_SIZE_POINTER gets copied into the proc_fs_info, then it could get dereferenced and cause a nasty crash. But that can only happen if Opt_lookup is in ctx->mask, at which point we're guaranteed that lookup_list is not ZERO_SIZE_POINTER.
Just wanted to document why this is safe, as it caught my eye at first.
> + if (!dst->lookup_list) { > + kfree(dst); > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + > + fc->fs_private = dst; > + return 0; > +} > + > static const struct fs_context_operations proc_fs_context_ops = { > .free = proc_fs_context_free, > + .dup = proc_fs_context_dup,
From my reading of vfs_dup_fs_context, it seems like if the dup() operation doesn't exist, the operation is simply bailed out and not supported.
339 struct fs_context *vfs_dup_fs_context(struct fs_context *src_fc) 340 { 341 struct fs_context *fc; 342 int ret; 343 344 if (!src_fc->ops->dup) 345 return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
So this patch is also adding support for the dup() operation where there wasn't before. Is that significant to call out in the changelog or split out as a separate patch?
Thanks, Stephen
> .parse_param = proc_parse_param, > .get_tree = proc_get_tree, > .reconfigure = proc_reconfigure, > @@ -274,6 +369,7 @@ static void proc_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb) > > kill_anon_super(sb); > put_pid_ns(fs_info->pid_ns); > + kfree(fs_info->lookup_list); > kfree(fs_info); > } > > @@ -317,11 +413,30 @@ static int proc_root_getattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > return 0; > } > > +bool in_lookup_list(const struct proc_lookup_list *ll, const char *str, unsigned int len) > +{ > + while (ll->len > 0) { > + if (ll->len == len && strncmp(ll->str, str, len) == 0) { > + return true; > + } > + ll = lookup_list_next(ll); > + } > + return false; > +} > + > static struct dentry *proc_root_lookup(struct inode * dir, struct dentry * dentry, unsigned int flags) > { > + struct proc_fs_info *proc_sb = proc_sb_info(dir->i_sb); > + > if (!proc_pid_lookup(dentry, flags)) > return NULL; > > + /* Top level only for now */ > + if (proc_sb->lookup_list && > + !in_lookup_list(proc_sb->lookup_list, dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.len)) { > + return NULL; > + } > + > return proc_lookup(dir, dentry, flags); > } > > --- a/include/linux/proc_fs.h > +++ b/include/linux/proc_fs.h > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > #include <linux/fs.h> > > struct proc_dir_entry; > +struct proc_lookup_list; > struct seq_file; > struct seq_operations; > > @@ -65,6 +66,7 @@ struct proc_fs_info { > kgid_t pid_gid; > enum proc_hidepid hide_pid; > enum proc_pidonly pidonly; > + const struct proc_lookup_list *lookup_list; > }; > > static inline struct proc_fs_info *proc_sb_info(struct super_block *sb) >
| |