lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 08/13] dt-bindings: serial: fsl-lpuart: add i.MXRT compatible
Date
Hello Rob, Jesse, All,

> Il giorno 3 nov 2021, alle ore 01:49, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> ha scritto:
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 6:34 PM Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 11/1/21 16:13, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:40:22AM -0400, Jesse Taube wrote:
>>>> Add i.MXRT documentation for compatible string.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <Mr.Bossman075@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml
>>>> index a90c971b4f1f..4b4340def2aa 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml
>>>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties:
>>>> - fsl,ls1028a-lpuart
>>>> - fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart
>>>> - fsl,imx8qm-lpuart
>>>> + - fsl,imxrt-lpuart
>>>
>>> Actually, 'rt' is not a single part is it? If the variations are same
>>> die, but fused off then no need to distinguish. Otherwise, these should
>>> be SoC specific.
>>>
>> I don't exactly know what "but fused off" means I would assume
>> disconnected but on-die?
>
> Right. Or not pinned out is another possibility.
>
>> The imxrtxxx is a series that has the same UART
>> controller across them. Should I add ACK?
>
> Looking at the errata docs briefly, there's at least 2 die as some of
> the errata docs give the mask id. So they aren't necessarily 'the
> same'.

Thank you for pointing, we’ve missed this particular.

> You want the compatible strings to be specific enough to handle
> any differences or errata. If you only care about the imxrt1050, then
> I'd just use that and move on.

We plan to add from imxrt1020 to imxrt1170 and eventual new SoC, so we definitely need separate
.compatible strings.

@Jesse, can you please update with ‘fsl,imxrt1050”?

> Otherwise, maybe someone from NXP wants
> to comment?

Any NXP comment is welcome!

Best regards
Giulio Benetti
Benetti engineering sas

>
> Rob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-03 03:50    [W:0.036 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site