[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/tc-testing: add exit code
On 2021-11-17 09:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:55:14 +0100 Davide Caratti wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 01:45:15PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
>>> Mark the summary result as FAIL to prevent from confusing the selftest
>>> framework if some of them are failed.
>>> Previously, the selftest framework always treats it as *ok* even though
>>> some of them are failed actually. That's because the script always
>>> return 0.
>> yes, also tdc was lacking support for KSFT_SKIP for a long time.
> Should this go via netdev? Is the risk of conflicts low enough
> so it doesn't matter?

Yes, discussions should at minimal Cc netdev + tc maintainers.

> We should probably add a MAINTAINERS entry for tdc. Adding Jamal.

Did you mean adding a maintainer for tdc or just generally point
who/what to involve when making changes? Typically the mailing list
should be sufficient. Outside the list, at the moment, any outstanding
issues on tdc are discussed/resolved in the monthly TC meetups (where
all the stake holders show up)...


 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-17 17:42    [W:0.090 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site