lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 00/11] VP9 codec V4L2 control interface
From
Date
Hi,

W dniu 17.11.2021 o 10:59, Hans Verkuil pisze:
> On 16/11/2021 14:14, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> W dniu 16.11.2021 o 09:21, Hans Verkuil pisze:
>>> On 16/11/2021 09:09, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
>>>> Hi Hans,
>>>>
>>>> W dniu 15.11.2021 o 22:16, Hans Verkuil pisze:
>>>>> On 15/11/2021 18:14, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Hans,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> W dniu 15.11.2021 o 16:07, Hans Verkuil pisze:
>>>>>>> Andrzej,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you rebase this series on top of the master branch of
>>>>>>> https://git.linuxtv.org/media_stage.git/ ? Unfortunately this v7 no longer
>>>>>>> applies. Specifically "rkvdec: Add the VP9 backend" failed in a non-trivial
>>>>>>> manner.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a branch for you:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://gitlab.collabora.com/linux/for-upstream/-/tree/vp9-uapi
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm getting a bunch of sparse/smatch warnings:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for finding this, I will re-create the branch and let you know on irc.
>>>> Some of the below are "false positives, namely:
>>>>
>>>> drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/omap3isp.h
>>>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h
>>>
>>> Ah, sorry, I though I had filtered those out. Obviously you can ignore those.
>>>
>>> Please post a v8. That way the series is archived on lore. And it works better
>>> with patchwork.
>>
>> Sure, no problem. Also please see below.
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Hans
>>>
>>>>
>>>> which are not touched by the series.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Andrzej
>>>>
>>>>> sparse:
>>>>> rkvdec/rkvdec-vp9.c:190:43: warning: variable 'dec_params' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>>>> rkvdec/rkvdec-vp9.c:245:43: warning: variable 'dec_params' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>>>> SPARSE:hantro/hantro_postproc.c hantro/hantro_postproc.c:37:35: warning: symbol 'hantro_g1_postproc_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>>>>
>>>>> smatch:
>>>>> rkvdec/rkvdec-vp9.c:190:43: warning: variable 'dec_params' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>>>> rkvdec/rkvdec-vp9.c:245:43: warning: variable 'dec_params' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>>>> rkvdec/rkvdec-vp9.c: rkvdec/rkvdec-vp9.c:236 init_intra_only_probs() error: buffer overflow 'ptr' 90 <= 91
>>
>> this looks a false positive.
>>
>> A portion of memory pointed to by ptr is indexed with i * 23 + m,
>> where i ranges from 0 to 3, inclusive, and m ranges from 0 to 22,
>> inclusive if i < 3, otherwise m ranges from 0 to 20, inclusive.
>> So the largest index value we compute equals 89 (3 * 23 + 20).
>> Because ptr points to something that is at least 90 bytes large,
>> 89 is a valid index and no greater index will be ever computed.
>
> But we do need to get rid of this smatch warning, otherwise it will pollute the
> list of smatch warnings.
>
> I was looking at the code and wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to
> move writing to rkprobs->intra_mode[i].uv_mode[] into a separate for loop:
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(v4l2_vp9_kf_uv_mode_prob); i++)
> rkprobs->intra_mode[i / 23].uv_mode[i % 23] = v4l2_vp9_kf_uv_mode_prob[i];
>
> Wouldn't that do the same as the current code? It looks simpler as well.
>

I think it would, but I would slightly change the loop:

for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(v4l2_vp9_kf_uv_mode_prob); i++) {
const u8 *ptr = (const u8 *)v4l2_vp9_kf_uv_mode_prob;

rkprobs->intra_mode[i / 23].uv_mode[i % 23] = ptr[i];
}

because v4l2_vp9_kf_uv_mode_prob is actually a u8[10][9].

I will make such a change locally and test whether it causes regressions.

Once I confirm it works (and I expect I will) would you like me to post a v9,
only reply to the changed patch with its updated version or do you want to make
this change yourself?

Andrzej

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-17 11:50    [W:0.194 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site