lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] remove PDE_DATA()
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 4:01 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:26:12 +0800 Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > because new instances are sure to turn up during the development cycle.
> > >
> > > But I can handle that by staging the patch series after linux-next and
> > > reminding myself to grep for new PDE_DATA instances prior to
> > > upstreaming.
> >
> > I'd be happy if you could replace PDE_DATA() with inode->i_private.
> > In this case, should I still introduce pde_data() and perform the above
> > things to make this series smaller?
>
> I do tend to think that pde_data() would be better than open-coding
> inode->i_private everywhere. More explanatory, easier if we decide to
> change it again in the future.
>

Got it. I'll do that in the next version. Thanks.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-17 09:25    [W:0.096 / U:1.660 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site