lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: remove unused defines in wifi.h
From
On 11/16/21 16:48, Zameer Manji wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:56 PM Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/16/21 04:14, Zameer Manji wrote:
>> > None of these defines in wifi.h are used so they
>> > can be safely removed.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Zameer Manji <zmanji@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/wifi.h | 57 --------------------------
>> > 1 file changed, 57 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/wifi.h b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/wifi.h
>> > index 193a557f0f47..7cbc7015e90f 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/wifi.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/wifi.h
>> > @@ -13,32 +13,9 @@
>> > #define BIT(x) (1 << (x))
>>
>> What about BIT() macro? It's already defined in include/vdso/bits.h and
>> can be included via include/bits.h.
>>
>> Most likely linux/ieee80211.h contains bits.h. Haven't checked yet, but
>> anyway redefining kernel macros is not good approach and BIT() can be
>> also removed.
>
> This is a good observation, but the objective of my patch is to remove
> unused defines so it will be easier to do the work that you mention. wifi.h
> and ieee80211.h redefine a few kernel provided values, and I intend to
> follow up by addressing all of them in one go.
>
> Would you be willing to ack this patch as is?
>

I cannot ack, since I am not the maintainer (or even reviewer) of this
driver :) I just saw this BIT() definition and decided to say, that it
can be also removed

Just to be clear: I am not against this patch as is, since _any_ clean
up for this driver is important


Thanks



With regards,
Pavel Skripkin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-16 15:01    [W:0.082 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site