lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: designware: Fix the kernel doc description for struct dw_i2c_dev
From
Date
On 11/12/21 8:43 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/12/21 8:26 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:01 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>> On 11/12/21 4:34 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>> + * @rinfo: I²C GPIO recovery information
>>>
>>> Preferably:   "I2C"
>>
>> Why?
>
> See below vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv:
>>> like it is in thousands of places in the kernel source tree.
>
>
>> UTF-8 has been established for more than a decade. I prefer to use the
>> proper form of the abbreviation (*).
>>
>> *) Check UM10204.pdf.


> > Yes, I am aware of what is in the spec.
>
> Wolfram, what do you prefer?

>I prefer I2C. But it is more a reading habit. I would neither enforce
>I2C nor I²C.

OK, let's leave it as Andy sent it then.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunla@infradead.org>


--
~Randy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-15 16:47    [W:0.074 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site