Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: designware: Fix the kernel doc description for struct dw_i2c_dev | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Date | Mon, 15 Nov 2021 07:46:42 -0800 |
| |
On 11/12/21 8:43 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 11/12/21 8:26 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:01 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: >>> On 11/12/21 4:34 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> >> ... >> >>>> + * @rinfo: I²C GPIO recovery information >>> >>> Preferably: "I2C" >> >> Why? > > See below vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv: >>> like it is in thousands of places in the kernel source tree. > > >> UTF-8 has been established for more than a decade. I prefer to use the >> proper form of the abbreviation (*). >> >> *) Check UM10204.pdf.
> > Yes, I am aware of what is in the spec. > > Wolfram, what do you prefer?
>I prefer I2C. But it is more a reading habit. I would neither enforce >I2C nor I²C.
OK, let's leave it as Andy sent it then.
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunla@infradead.org>
-- ~Randy
| |